Go语言中写文件有多种方式,这里进行如下几种方式的速度对比:
1)打开文件,写入内容,关闭文件。如此重复多次;
2)打开文件,写入内容,defer关闭文件。如此重复多次;
3)打开文件,重复多次写入内容,defer关闭文件;
在VMWare下的Ubuntu 14.04下运行的结果表明:
方式1速度最慢,但是慢的很稳定
方式2比方式1略快,但是重复次数多了后会报错,应该是defer被压栈太多导致系统撑不了太多打开的文件
方式3速度约是前两者的2倍,因为减少了很多打开关闭文件的操作
测试代码如下:
package main
import ( "fmt"
"os"
"time")
func benchmarkFileWrite(filename string, n int, index int) (d time.Duration) {
v := "ni shuo wo shi bu shi tai wu liao le a?"
os.Remove(filename)
t0 := time.Now() switch index { case 0: // open file and write, then close, repeat n times
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
file, err := os.OpenFile(filename, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_APPEND|os.O_CREATE, 0666) if err != nil {
fmt.Println(index, i, "open file failed.", err.Error()) break
}
file.WriteString(v)
file.WriteString("\n")
file.Close()
} case 1: // open file and write, defer close, repeat n times
for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
file, err := os.OpenFile(filename, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_APPEND|os.O_CREATE, 0666) if err != nil {
fmt.Println(index, i, "open file failed.", err.Error()) break
}
defer file.Close()
file.WriteString(v)
file.WriteString("\n")
} case 2: // open file and write n times, then close file
file, err := os.OpenFile(filename, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_APPEND|os.O_CREATE, 0666) if err != nil {
fmt.Println(index, "open file failed.", err.Error()) break
}
defer file.Close() for i := 0; i < n; i++ {
file.WriteString(v)
file.WriteString("\n")
}
}
t1 := time.Now()
d = t1.Sub(t0)
fmt.Printf("time of way(%d)=%v\n", index, d) return d
}
func main() { const k, n int = 3, 1000
d := [k]time.Duration{} for i := 0; i < k; i++ {
d[i] = benchmarkFileWrite("benchmarkFile.txt", n, i)
} for i := 0; i < k-1; i++ {
fmt.Printf("way %d cost time is %6.1f times of way %d\n", i, float32(d[i])/float32(d[k-1]), k-1)
}
}
当n=1000时,测试结果如下
time of way(0)=38.719386ms
time of way(1)=31.428677ms
time of way(2)=17.930829ms
way 0 cost time is 2.2 times of way 2
way 1 cost time is 1.8 times of way 2
当n=5000时,测试结果如下(因为方式1报错,所以它的时间是错的)
time of way(0)=170.003521ms 1 1021 open file failed. open benchmarkFile.txt: too many open files
time of way(1)=32.388994ms
time of way(2)=77.777936ms
way 0 cost time is 2.2 times of way 2
way 1 cost time is 0.4 times of way 2