decisions on a second front
- before 1943
- SU desperate in need for Allied help
- Stalin bringing up the topic
- Churchill unwilling b/c fear of failure of another Dieppe raid
- depended on UK to provide the land troop
- US & UK to not launch attack in 1942
- May 1943
- Stalin - Churchill for the 3rd time attempted to delay second front to 1 May 1944
- but overruled by FDR
- Churchill
- dreaded failure and loss of lives
- no more British glories!
- US military leaders knew the need for SU alliance
Bretton Woods conference
- gov. to call IMF (International Monetary Fund) for help
- for macro-economics
- $ replace pound for world’s main currency
- World Bank
- for micro developmental projects
- transfer of economic power from UK to US
- declare gold reserves and inspections to request loans
US-SU discussions on credits
- SU: export raw materials and import industrial goods
- US doubts:
- old and coal industry competitions
- Kennan - SU’s huge purchasing power to exploit US industry
- failed b/c:
- Congress not accepting post-war credits when war still going on
- reserves of Export-Import Bank almost exhausted
- proposed 3.375 interest rate Lend Lease
- SU refused b/c too high -> asked for 2.25 %
- Congress unwilling to lend beyond end of hostilities + larger voices for SU political concessions
Conflict over Germany
European Advisory commission (EAC)
- to advise SU, UK, US on ANY conflicting interests
- US and SU refuse to discuss post-war settlements b/c unforeseeable
Yalta
- Stalin demanded $20 billion for SU and Germany’s victims
East and south-east Europe problem
US taken for granted
- the states to follow the Atlantic Charter: self-determination + democracy + market economy
FDR: no discussion of post-war settlements / territorial gains before war ends!
- refused / ignored Churchill & British gov.’s demands to accept SU territorial requests
- disliked the % agreements
- Stalin response: unilateral agreement ignoring West
pressure from pro-Western and minorities in eastern Europe
- US to adhere to the Atlantic Charter
Yalta
- Stalin more understanding and agreed to publish the ‘Declaration on Liberated Europe’
- both Lublin committee and London Poles recognized & Polish gov. organized elections
- overwhelming optimism in the US
FDR’s foreign policies
- universalism rather than isolationaism
- liberal capitalism everywhere
- no more spheres of influence by self-determination
- SU genuinely hoping for collaboration
- acceptance of SU spheres of influence + US technology
change of office
- Truman and Attlee less tolerating Stalin’s spheres of influence (Allies handed Bulgaria quietly to Stalin at Potsdam)
- Potsdam - Truman already on office
Oder-Neisse line: border between Poland & Germany
Poland
- Provisional Government claiming territories with Yalta still going on
- 21 April 1945 SU treaty of friendship
- Western refused Poland admission to consultative meeting of the UN
FDR
personality: more subtle
- master of ambiguity
- knows how to charm the SU
- how to maintain the Big 3’s relations
the Atomic Bomb
FDR: Manhattan Project sanctioned only to not let Germany the first
Truman: sanctioned the dropping on Japan
- controversial
- advised by James F. Byrnes
- tough attitude to Japan -> need no mercy!
- no shared secret
Japanese ruthlessness at US
- wanted mediation on terms without surrender, occupation, or changes in the imperial system
SU, Manchuria and Korea
Manchuria & Korea as a buffer zone for SU between Japan
US wanted civil war between Guomindang and communists to end -> don’t want to be involved in it
Kim Il Sung
- served under SU command to unify Korea
Syngman Rhee
ROK founded August 1948
North Korea highly industrialized than the south
- due to Japanese occupation
US changing attitudes
- whole Americans in contact w/ SU
- SU thought as invaded by barbaric Asians
- British & SU conflict over maltreatment of German women
- rape exeeded 2 million including Ukrainian and Polish women forced
- astonishment and resentment at SU behavior promoted ‘Riga axioms’
- & questions of FDR’s foreign policies
- adopted Riga axiom
- US underestimated SU security needs in eastern Europe & overestimated SU’s will to expand
- domino theory
- possible proof: SU demands for military bases in the Straits and a mandate in Libya
- world falling to SU if US not prevent
- eastern Europe example
- economic crisis in Europe -> possible political revolution and communist infiltration!
- Truman - amateur in foreign diplomacy
- Wilsonian but gave up on FDR’s politics; turned realistic
- on ‘important matters’ the Americans ‘should be able to get 85 per cent’ of what they want
- Wilsonian but gave up on FDR’s politics; turned realistic
cooperation & pressure
US public: ‘Bring the boys home’
- no more sacrifices!
US&UK tension
- Truman to Churchill, asking for private meeting w/ Stalin
- Churchill protested but Truman went on as still
- Truman recognized Poland’s new gov.
- irritated Churchill
- State Department against UK’s aim for a western European bloc b/c it reduced free trade
Truman & Stalin’s private conversation
- treating as friends
- Stalin convinced US friendship & went on to take eastern Europe & other parts
- Soviet-Turkish alliance to return Turkey to SU territory
- Truman refused to recognize Romania and Bulgaria gov.
- need self-determination & free elections!
US changed their mind toward the end of the Potsdam conference
- SU reparations + capital equipments from Germany’s western zone
- Oder-Neisse line
- recognition of Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Finland on top priority
- good impression until failure of the Council of Foreign Ministers in London Sep. 1945
Lend-Lease deliveries ended abruptely and enraged SU
- US: reparation as low as possible to recover market economy
Yalta agreements & different interpretations of democracy
SU request on credits
- only allowed on concession for:
- guaranteed US property
- distribution of US media
- freedom of religion
- press
- genuine free election
dilemma at the 4 policemen dream
- how to reconcile a realistic foreign policy abroad with an indealistic foreign policy at home
failure of the Council of Foreign Ministers 11 September - 2 October 1945
Moscow Council of Foreign Ministers meeting December 1945
- some concessions
pressure on Byrnes
- difficult to convince the American public that his foreign policies followed the Atlantic Charter
- concession at the Moscow conference
- 2 non-communist miniters to Romania & Bulgaria gov. = US recognition
- Truman exasperated & tired of concessions
- ‘I do not think we should play compromise any longer… I’m tired of babying the Soviets’
- Byrnes - Secretary of State
1945 & reasons for Cold War
- 1945; US policy changed
- SU policy remained on seeking agreements until autumn 1947
- change of US policy due to SU behavior in eastern Europe
- largely due to A bomb
- US duty to protect the small countries (went to WW2 to protect them from Nazi)
- incompatibility of US and SU views
- possible for socialist Europe
- if US exported capitals throughout Europe & pulled out the troops
- possible for socialist Europe
- US underestimation of SU security needs
- refused to cooperate -> SU to view US policies as aggressive capitalist expansionism
- US multiplicity of views
- unclear what its interests & policies should be at any given moment
- no clear vision for the Germany question
- SU gov. difficult to judge US intentions genuine or test
- Molotov’s personality
- wanted too much of SU goodness and failed to charm
- distrust on both sides
- but partly due to detailed instructions by Stalin
